Since, presumably, more folks will be reading Politburo minutes than my personal blog, I've decided to start posting here some of the more perplexing pieces of purple prose I encounter as I grade undergraduate exams and papers.
I came across two gems tonight, grading for a course on American Cultural and Intellectual History since 1877 (you would've thought the course finished the first week of the term, no?). One of the prompts asks to assess a debate between John Dewey and Randolph Bourne over U.S. entry into the Great War. Thankfully, this isn't the class I'm actually TAing, as I would be tempted to strangle my own students if they began their essays with these doozies:
"John Dewey and Randolph Bourne could be the 19th century Plato and Aristotle - minus the funny robes and Latin." Yup, that's why Greece is known as the cradle of democracy, because they spoke Latin in Athens. Uh, oops. This gets my vote for best inappropriate analogy involving an ancient Greek philosopher since Shaquille O'Neal began referring to himself as "the Big Aristotle." (This was also about the time he said his game was like the Pythagorean Theorem, since no one had the answer. To which my then-roommate replied, "C squared.") And, of course, the student didn't even place the Great War in the right century.
Evidently many students are fuzzy about the timing of the Great War and the sequence of events that let to America's entry. At least in this class.
"The beginning of WWI was brought to the American people due to the sinking of the supply ship the Mesopatamia [sic]." Wow. Another ancient civilization butchered at the hands of the undergraduate history student. I think she meant the
Lusitania, though we all know the fall of the modern Babylon has brought America ever closer to ruin.